Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study Was to translate, validate and adapted in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament French-Return to Sport after-Injury (ACL-RSI), a 12-item scale English lan- guage Assessing the psychological impact of returning to sports after-ACL reconstruction.
Methods The ACL-RSI Was scale forward and back trans- lated, cross-adapté Culturally and validated using international guidelines. The study population included all patients Who Were in active sports and underwent arthroscopic Scopic primary ACL reconstruction. The control group included sub- jects with no history of knee trauma. At the 6-month follow- up, the study population completed the ACL-RSI scale twice Within 3-4 days, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and subjective International Knee Documen- tation Committee (IKDC) scores. Statistical tests Assessed the construct validity, discriminant validity, internal consistency, reliability and Feasibility of the ACL-RSI scale.
Results Ninety-one patients with ACL tears and 98 control subjects Were included: mean age 31.7 ±8.1 and 21.8 ± 2 respectivement. The ACL-RSI Were scores correlated with all KOOS sub-categories (r = 0.22-0.64, p 0.05) as well as the subjective IKDC score (r = 0.42, p 0.00001). The mean scores of the study and control groups signifi- cantly Were different (62.8 ± 19.4 vs. 89.6± 11.5, p 0.00001), and scores Were Significantly better in patients Who returned to the Saami sport (72.1 ± 21.4 vs. 60.3 ± 18.1, p = 0.008). Was high internal consistency (a = 0.96). Test-retest reproducibility was excellent: q = 0.90 (0.86-0.94), p 0.00001. Administration Time Was 1.32 ± 0.7 min, and all items Were Answered. Conclusion This study Showed que le cross-cultural adaptation of the English Version of the ACL-RSI suc- cessful Was and validated in a French-speaking population. The discriminative capacity of the scale entre Who patients underwent reconstruction and healthy subjects Was confirmed. Level of evidence II.